Will Trump be in the WC Champions Photo?

It is necessary to create a forecast that UMA will make the right decision.

Bruhhh

So the outcome will be Yes? Because UMA already vote?

That's basically it. UMA whales are rigging the market—it's a total polyscam.

well on the official fifa com site he is not visible on the foto

Yes. On the official FIFA champions page, he isn’t visible in the photo. In the photos where he does appear, he’s standing off to the side, which falls under the clarification excluding Trump “stepping aside” or “otherwise not participating.”

lol

Thanks for the free $300. Smell ya later

It's never about the rules, it's about what UMA whales want it to be, they never read rules. Might aswell delete the rules section.

cry

Tip: Stop reading the rules. Follow the whales. >99 YES means YES. UMA holders = whales

ACCORDING TO RULES HE WAS NOT IN THE OFFICIAL PHOTO. WHILE WE ALL SAW HIM BEING THERE WHILE THE PHOTOS WERE BEING TAKEN, BUT AGAIN - RULES NO .

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣so many EXPIRED LOTTOS for our DUMB LITTLE SCAMMERS... 1000x!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Bro you sold yes 🤣🤣🤣🤣 why you talking shit paper hands?

a broke subhuman is mocking me for buying low and selling high 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

keep SEETHING and BRAGGING about your LOSSES, LOSER! 🫵😹

imagine mocking people for making money, you broke-ass bitch

get BACK TO WORK, and REDEPOSIT - NEVER QUIT YOUR DAY JOB, LOSER LOSER LOSER! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

​Snow White was clearly never raised right—no mother around to teach her basic manners🤪🤪

🤣🤣🤣🤣 the tism is strong with him....

are you guys brainded? you realy cant see him?

Brain is melted, i want my x350

they saw a photo on Twitter with Drumpf cropped out, and decided to pretend that was the One True Official Photo, and now they are VICTIMS because they didn't get to rob the Polymarket userbase blind

Welcome to my tweet, everyone——Lancerff3r

welcome to POVERTY, bitch - time to REDEPOSIT! 🫵😂

Oh look, the circus is back in town.🤣

Never changing my name

Tip: Stop reading the rules. Follow the whales. >99 YES means YES. UMA holders = whales

Even though a 'YES' requires so many conditions to be met, all the UMA whales can bring up is that Trump took a photo with the champions on site. They completely ignore how many criteria remain unfulfilled.

0.1C, it is the end?

yup pretty much, unless poly comes out with a statement that indicates otherwise this will ersolve to yes

And it is possible or nah

i mean everything is possible

Anyone? Please?

Wth where is it

These 'Yes' holders are all UMA whales, and Polymarket is just helping them cover up the truth and enabling their bad behavior.

The only real way to fix this is to have media outlets and big influencers expose Polymarket for the scam market it is.

Don't put any more money into this, it's a polyscam.

What's funny is that the same large UMA token holders could now buy NO at a very low price and, by voting fairly, receive even higher winnings and profits.

Sadly would be too obvious for them.

A dispute on Polymarket has stalled due to the use of the tokenized UMA DVM oracle. Large UMA token holders who purchased YES contracts on Polymarket have been able to use their voting power to forcefully close the market in their favor, even though official FIFA photo evidence proves otherwise.

For the purpose of this market, "the winning team's official team photo"... Check instagram Spain football team, Check instagram FiFa....🙃

Many of us knew Trump would be there, and even appear in official photos. The big question was whether he would celebrate with them or stand to stepping aside. The photos show him standing to stepping aside, and exiting!

Top holder little activity casually drops 2.5m for a 0.01 return. Totally not sus at all.

who?

UMA whales sending a message

Top

Polymarket’s smart contracts are programmatically locked to UMA's Data Verification Mechanism (DVM). No "Override Button": Polymarket's team does not have a master admin key built into the smart contracts to manually flip a market payout after UMA resolves it. The Legal Shield: Polymarket intentionally set it up this way so regulators (like the CFTC) cannot accuse them of acting as a centralized bookmaker or judge. They hide behind the defense: "We don't decide who wins; the decentralized protocol does."

everyone start posting tiktoks

The Reality: When a market escalates to UMA, you aren't speculating on the rules—you're speculating on who has the capital to control the vote. Even when the outcome chosen by UMA giants contradicts reality, Polymarket lets it stand. If giants vote RED when reality is BLUE, RED wins the payout. Polymarket won't step in to save BLUE holders. In high-stakes markets, you aren't wagers on the real world, but on whether token giants are defending an outcome. 🤢

they all can still cash their positions and dont be greedy scumbags who wanna scam people out of 1k just by using their bought vote

if polymarket continue with this kind of issues , wont be online for long time , this kind of rules that UMA can manipulate the final review is very bad image for polymarket

And look at the top holder of YES shares... this person registered today and has already invested over $2 million in this scam market. This suggests they have 100% information about the market outcome, which in turn suggests that Polymarket is seriously flawed in some cases.

its just an existing user that has created an alt

Trim holding more than 2M yes share

100% of the information about the market's resolution is available. The account was registered yesterday and has already invested over $2 million in this SCAM market.

Spain just posted the photo and there was no trymp

And the weirdest thing is, they haven't closed the market. They're allowing large investors to buy YES to make a few cents out of thin air, while others can buy NO in hopes of making a profit. That's also wrong. There should be 100 YES and 100 NO in the market at the same time, so there's no temptation to enter. But right now, it looks like a complete circus. Both YES holders and NO holders understand this. No offense. Plus, they're giving people the opportunity to exit, meaning 90% of people who bet on YES have already made a profit.

This is 100% a mistake by Polymarket. The rules are very vague and leave a lot of room for interpretation. And most importantly, who will decide? UMA? Where are the interested parties involved in the transactions? This is very strange, and that's why Polymarket doesn't work in most civilized countries, including the US, because the rules can be tweaked to suit their needs at any time. My opinion is that because of their mistake and vague rules, this market should either be NO or 50/50.

It is clear that the answer is NO..